You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 4 Scientific agreement of formulated recommendations for management of malignant pleural effusion

From: Quality assessment of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions and ascites

Recommendations ATS, 2018 [5] ERS, 2018 [2] BTS, 2010 [3] CGDTMPE, 2014 [4] CSCO, 2018 [1] CTS, 2009 [6] JSPM1, 2016 [7] JSPM2, 2016 [8]
Known or suspected malignant pleural effusion
Asymptomatic
  Should pleural intervention be performed? 80~100% 80~100%
Symptomatic
  Should pleural interventions guided by ultrasound? 80~100% 80~100% 80~100% 80~100%
  Should large-volume thoracentesis be performed?
IPCs or pleurodesis
Expandable lung
  Should IPCs or chemical pleurodesis be used as first-line definitive pleural intervention? 80~100% 40~60% 40~60% 40~60% 40~60%
  Should talc poudrage or talc slurry be used? 0~20% 80~100% 80~100% 40~60%
Nonexpandable lung, failed pleurodesis, loculated effusion
  Should IPCs or chemical pleurodesis be used as first-line definitive pleural intervention? 80~100% 80~100% 80~100%
Other management
  Should medical therapy alone or medical therapy and catheter removal be used in IPC-associated infection?
  1. Measurement Scale of Rate of Agreement: 0~20% radically different, 20~40% numerous major scientific disagreements present, 40~60% few major scientific disagreements present, 60~80% only minor scientific disagreements present, and 80~100% absolute scientific agreement. In blank fields, no information is available